[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: SETF-OPTIONAL-ARGUMENTS (Version 1)



??? GETHASH returns two values, yet your examples has it returning 3. 

I'm baffled by this issue, however. "SETF may be used with GETHASH to make
new entries in a hash table. ... The default argument may be specified to
GETHASH in this context; it is ignored by SETF, but may be useful in such
macros as INCF that are related to SETF." 

This seems perfectly clear to me. I don't think that this is a SETF policy
at all. I think you should withdraw this.