[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: SUBTYPEP-EMPTY-NIL (Version 1)
- To: KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- Subject: Issue: SUBTYPEP-EMPTY-NIL (Version 1)
- From: gz@spt.entity.com (Gail Zacharias)
- Date: 8 Feb 89 01:10:18 EST (Wed)
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman's message of Tue, 7 Feb 89 15:59 EST <890207155926.7.KMP@BOBOLINK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
This is a joke, right? You're not seriously suggesting that
(SUBTYPEP <empty set> NIL) => NIL T is anything but a bug?