[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Issue status
- From: chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
- Date: 15 Mar 89 14:29
> > >+ FUNCTION-COMPOSITION
> > >Synopsis: Add new functions
> > >Version 5, 10-Feb-89
> > >Status: Passed (as amended) Jan 89 X3J13
> > I know this is picky, but I thought it was decided to fail this one
> > completely and amend TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (I believe that was the related
> > issue).
> -- you may be right. I wish we had minutes. I guess I'll stick by my
> summary unless I hear otherwise.
>My notes show that the COMPLEMENT function was accepted and
>all other parts of the proposal failed.
Yes but COMPLEMENT was an amendment to TEST-NOT-IF-NOT. This was how Walter
and I both recorded it. Anyway, it seems to be clear what happened even
if the status of the issues isn't.