[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1

To: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
Subject: issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 89 11:47 EDT
Cc: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: <8904050359.AA11925@bhopal>

It's my belief that a close reading of the GLS and KMP amendment to
DYNAMIC-EXTENT (which was passed out at the meeting last week and
was unanimously adopted by X3J13 provides an unambiguous answer to
each of your concerns.

Follow-Ups:
- issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1
  - From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>

References:
- issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1
  - From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue: LISP-SYMBOL-REDEFINITION
Next by Date: Issue: DYNAMIC-EXTENT (Version 4)
Previous by thread: issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1
Next by thread: issue DYNAMIC-EXTENT-FUNCTION, version 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread