[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PATHNAME-COMPONENT-VALUE (version 2)
- To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-COMPONENT-VALUE (version 2)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 24 May 89 23:37 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Tue, 23 May 89 13:20 EDT
I wish "other implementations were not surveyed" were not true. Will "other
implementations" speak up? My quick glance at this didn't turn up anything
too serious, except the risk of overspecifying based on limited experience.