[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
issue status, 12/12/88
- To: cl-compiler@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: issue status, 12/12/88
- From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 88 14:43:03 MST
Here is the summary of the status of our pending issues as of today.
Once again I must ask you to note that we are running out of time
before the January meeting. My effective deadline is the middle of
next week, because that's when I'm going on vacation.
These issues appear to be ready for release.
ALLOW-LOCAL-INLINE
COMPILE-ENVIRONMENT-CONSISTENCY
COMPILER-LET-CONFUSION
DEFCONSTANT-SPECIAL
LOAD-TIME-EVAL
SHARP-COMMA-CONFUSION
The following issues are those that I would like to finish up within the
next week or so, with notes on what remains to be done.
COMPILER-DIAGNOSTICS
The NOTICE condition type hasn't happened yet. I was going to change
references to the NOTICE condition to the STYLE-WARNING condition,
which is a subtype of warning (allowing user condition handlers to use
the MUFFLE-WARNING restart on it to suppress the messages). Any
objections?
COMPILER-VERBOSITY
Pierson indicated he wanted to submit an alternate proposal on this
issue, but hasn't done so. Can/should we go ahead with the current
proposal?
COMPILE-FILE-HANDLING-OF-TOP-LEVEL-FORMS
I've been working on a revised version that is essentially complete
except for information about the CLOS defining macros. The CLOS
people haven't responded to my requests for help. I don't hear from
them, should we release the issue anyway, leaving the CLOS macros for
later?
DEFINING-MACROS-NON-TOP-LEVEL
EVAL-WHEN-NON-TOP-LEVEL
There's been a suggestion that defining macros should only cause
compile-time side effects at top level, and that (EVAL-WHEN
(COMPILE)...) should be a no-op except at top level. Is this
agreeable to everybody?
QUOTE-MAY-COPY
Do we really need all three options in the latest writeup?
CONSTANT-COMPILABLE-TYPES
We need a new draft of this proposal to incorporate the latest
round of discussion. Cris???
CONSTANT-CIRCULAR-COMPILATION
CONSTANT-COLLAPSING
CONSTANT-MODIFICATION
If nobody has complaints about the latest writeups, I'll move these
into the "ready for release" category.
The following issues are those which I don't plan to work on myself
until after the January meeting:
CONSTANT-ARRAY-ATTRIBUTES
Subsumed by CONSTANT-COMPILABLE-TYPES?
COMPILE-FILE-ENVIRONMENT
Superseded by issue SYNTACTIC-ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS, unless that issue
has died.
DEFCONSTANT-NOT-WIRED
Still under discussion, no consensus yet
DEFCONSTANT-VALUE
Subsumed by issue COMPILE-FILE-HANDLING-OF-TOP-LEVEL-FORMS
DEFINE-OPTIMIZER
Waiting for revisions (Pitman)
FILE-COMPILATION
same issue as CONSTANT-COMPILABLE-TYPES
PROCLAIM-ETC-IN-COMPILE-FILE
Waiting for resolution of related cleanup issues (DEFPACKAGE,
IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY)
SYNTACTIC-ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS
Waiting for new writeup (Benson)
WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT
Waiting for revisions to existing proposal (Pitman)
-------