[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Re: Issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
- From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 89 08:29:03 MST
- Cc: Dick Gabriel <RPG@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, cl-compiler@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM, 16 Mar 89 07:02 PST
Hmmm. I thought this would be the least controversial of any of our
issues!
Seriously folks, I believe the intent of this proposal was *only* to
say that (OPTIMIZE (SAFETY 3)) is the only magic incantation you need
to be guaranteed to get "safe code". Some of the objections to the
way it's stated seem valid to me, but let's not try to read more into
the issue than was intended.
If anybody wants to submit a new version which fixes the wording, feel
free.
-Sandra
-------