[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compilation implications
- To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Compilation implications
- From: kempf@Sun.COM
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 89 18:36:24 PST
- Cc: kempf@Sun.COM, Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>, Common-Lisp-Object-System@Sail.Stanford.edu, CL-Compiler@Sail.Stanford.edu, cperdue%suntana@Sun.COM
- In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 03 Jan 89 12:56:00 -0500. <19890103175655.8.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
>thought you said you agreed with my proposal that the way to load an
>instance of a standard-class from a compiled file is for a method of the
>instance to return a form which is then evaluated at load time. Once
>this is adopted, there is no such thing as "the instance structure in
>the file" and no issue of making that structure consistent with some
>other structure. The semantics of loading an instance of a standard-class
Right. In general, this will be the case, but remember that your proposal
leaves open a programmer hook which may, in specific instances, require
the class redefinition protocol to be run. However, they will probably
be rare, so we can disregard them for now.
jak