[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue COMPILER-LET-CONFUSION, v3



> And some of us do.  I freely admit that COMPILER-LET is rarely used, and
> probably even more rarely used correctly because it isn't well documented.

Is there a way to make COMPILER-LET work correctly short of requiring
that interpreters do a macroexpansion prepass?  Right now, I can't use
COMPILER-LET in portable code because some macroexpansions happen after
the dynamic extent of the COMPILER-LET bindings has ended.