[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: LOAD-TIME-EVAL
- To: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu
- Subject: Re: Issue: LOAD-TIME-EVAL
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 89 15:50 EDT
- Cc: KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, CL-Compiler@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: <8904041946.AA19191@defun.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 89 13:46:20 MDT
From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
Although I neglected to write down any notes on this issue at the
meeting, my recollection is that we agreed an amendment was not
necessary and that an editorial clarification would suffice. It
didn't seem like a controversial point.
This is fine with me. It does seem like a non-controversial thing, so I
don't care specifically how it's handled as long as it doesn't fall through
the cracks.