[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue CONSTANT-CIRCULAR-COMPILATION, version 4
- To: Jim McDonald <jlm@lucid.com>
- Subject: Re: issue CONSTANT-CIRCULAR-COMPILATION, version 4
- From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 89 13:47:53 MST
- Cc: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu, cperdue@Sun.COM, KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, cl-compiler@sail.stanford.edu, jeff%aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
- In-reply-to: Jim McDonald <jlm@lucid.com>, Thu, 26 Jan 89 12:16:11 PST
Is there anybody who would still prefer the *DUMP-CIRCLE* proposal to
one that simply says that COMPILE-FILE must handle circularities and
shared structure properly all the time? That way we would have three
proposals covering a range of possibilities: no sharing, no
circularity; sharing but not circularity; and both sharing and
circularity.
-Sandra
-------