[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unification of series with generators/gatherers

To: "cperdue%Sun.COM@berkeley.edu"@multimax.encore.com (Cris Perdue)
Subject: Re: Unification of series with generators/gatherers
From: Dan L. Pierson <pierson@mist.encore.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 89 00:17:35 EST
Cc: "loop-group%clam%Sun.COM@berkeley.edu"@Multimax.encore.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 10 Jan 89 15:22:14 -0800. <8901102322.AA00650@clam.sun.com>

I remain a supporter of series, generators, and gatherers (in that
order).  You and Dick appear to have made some giant steps since
October and I would like to see your work continue.  While I can't make
any promises until a final report and implementation appears, I would
expect to also to see that your work or a parallel descendent of it
ships with any Common Lisp product we produce whether or not X3J13 decides 
to take any action on it.

References:
- Unification of series with generators/gatherers
  - From: cperdue@Sun.COM (Cris Perdue)

Prev by Date: Unification of series with generators/gatherers
Next by Date: Getting experimental usage of OSS++
Previous by thread: Unification of series with generators/gatherers
Next by thread: Getting experimental usage of OSS++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread