[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: standard type class
> - eliminate the term "standard type class"
> - when we mean "a class that corresponds to a predefined Common
> Lisp type" we should say exactly that, no need to abbreviate.
> - rename the standard-type-class metaclass to built-in-class,
> and clarify that it is implementation-dependent whether any
> potentially built-in class is in fact built-in and has this
> - clarify the requirements on portable programs
These suggestions and the accompanying draft appear to clarify the built
in class section.