[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: making gf lambda lists
> It's always a metter of philosophy whether to bring functions like
> that we know are in there someplace out into the open and give them
> names. I like the SETF approach, which says to document only the
> that the user really has to know about.
I agree with the philosophy but find it curious that the proposal to
have SETF named functions is to remedy the fact that the SETF macro
approach hides things which people discovered they sometimes need.
Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM's message of Mon, 23 Nov 87
20:57:00 EST -- making gf lambda lists