[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

with-accessors

    Date: Tue, 22 Dec 87 18:18 PST
    From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM

    (with-accessors ((x position-x)
		     (y position-y))
		    p1
      (setq x y))

I like this.  I think we should put it in.

Is (with-accessors (x y)
		   p1
      (setq x y))
allowed for consistency with with-slots?  It would only work for classes
that use the naming convention that accessor function names are the same
as slot names, which might mean that its existence leads to confusion.
Hence I suggest that we should not allow this abbreviated syntax.