[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology

To: common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
Subject: Re: Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology
From: Pavel.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 88 12:58:07 PST
In-reply-to: <19880321204529.4.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

In both of Moon's proposed rewordings, I would much rather see the word
``should'' instead of the word ``must''.  It seems ludicrous to me for the
conformance status of an implementation to depend upon its documentation.

	Pavel

References:
- Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology
Next by Date: Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology (II)
Previous by thread: Proposed Wording Change to the Error Terminology
Next by thread: Proposed Wording PicoChange to the Error Terminology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread