Re: Method-lambda and apply-method-lambda

[kempf@Sun.COM]

>>I don't think that method-lambda, as describe in 88-003 is good enough.  It
>>captures the contract between a class of generic functions and a class of methods,
>>so it should be metaclass driven.  You can imagine several contracts on a single
>>implementation. 

Why, precisely, do you think there need be any difference between a method
function and any other kind of function? I can understand this for
a generic function, since a generic function has slots, but a method
function has none. It seems to me that most of how a method function
differs is covered by additions to its lexical environment, and that
FUNCALL and APPLY should do.

		jak