[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)

To: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)
From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 89 10:00 PST
Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, CL-Compiler@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, Common-Lisp-Object-System@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
Fcc: BD:>Gregor>mail>outgoing-mail-5.text.newest
In-reply-to: <19890128034814.6.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Line-fold: no

I support FUNCTION-NAME:MEDIUM and may support LARGE once I think about
it some more.

As I explained in Hawaii, support for either of these is based on the
:conc-name bugs being removed from the condition system.  Of course, I
believe the best way to do that is to CLOSify it.
-------

References:
- Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)
Next by Date: editorial comments on chapter 3
Previous by thread: Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)
Next by thread: Issue: FUNCTION-NAME (Version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread