[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


The guidelines you mailed out are okay with me.  I think before
publishing this a bit more description of what it means in practice
for the cost of a change to be large or small should be included;
this would be something like a description of the process, where
"small" changes would be adopted easily if they have merit, whereas
"large" changes would have to survive some more elaborate process.
They way I've just described it is poor, and I don't think I would
agree with it myself if phrased that way.  I think I saw a better
description go by in the mail in the past few days, but I can't
find it now.  Perhaps you have it.