Re: missing OR ptype

• To: clim@BBN.COM
• Subject: Re: missing OR ptype
• From: Kevin Thompson <kthompso@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov>
• Date: 8 Feb 91 21:39:55 GMT
• Newsgroups: ri.clim
• Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
• References: <10371@ptolemy-ri.ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov>
• Sender: usenet@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov

In article <10371@ptolemy-ri.ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov> Dan Cerys <cerys@BBN.COM> writes:
>Just to clarify, we are using CLIM 0.9 on a variety of platforms.  The
>excellent presentation system done by Symbolics for CLIM 1.0 is
>unfortunately not in 0.9.  (Sigh).  

Aieeeeeeee.  Could someone explain why the various versions of CLIM appear
to be diverging?  I've heard rumours of this from several different parties,
and it *does* after all seem to defeat the main purpose (in my mind at
least) of CLIM -- platform independence.  Is there a single person (at ILA I
assume) who can assuage fears that platform independence is far, far off?

Kevin Thompson

--
kthompso@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov     NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA

0,,

• Re: missing OR ptype
• From: "Mark A. Son-Bell" <MAS-B@fuji.ila.com>

• Prev: missing OR ptype
• Next: clim mail archive?
• Index: CLIM Mailing list (5-Oct-90 to 31-Dec-91)
• Thread: CLIM Mailing list Index (5-Oct-90 to 31-Dec-91)