[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: problems with garnet
- To: clisp-list@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de
- Subject: re: problems with garnet
- From: rodw@cbl.leeds.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:38:18 +0100
- Alternate-recipient: Allowed
- X400-content-type: P2-1984 (2)
- X400-mts-identifier: [/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;<27542.9401210838@cblelcc.cbl.le]
- X400-originator: rodw@cbl.leeds.ac.uk
- X400-received: by mta d400relay in /PRMD=dfnrelay/ADMD=d400/C=de/; Relayed; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:40:17 +0100
- X400-received: by /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/; Relayed; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:38:25 +0100
- X400-received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:38:15 +0100
- X400-received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:38:18 +0100
- X400-received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:38:18 +0100
- X400-recipients: non-disclosure:;
>i have also tried to use garnet on a rs6000 with 120 meg of real memory.
>i found it to be slow slow as to be unusable. i think that the problem
>needs work but i dont know how to figure out how to time different
>sections of code.
Isn't clisp compiled down to byte codes and that then interpreted? That
would explain why its so easy to port, but doesn't run very fast.
I'm not sure that this is the case but it would certainly explain the speed
problems.
Rod