[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

portability of .fas files is questionable

Hi,

I agree that having portable .fas files would be a nice thing to have,
but what scheme could be used to avoid problems with machine-specific
macros that get compiled into one's code? As an example,
USER1.LSP:with-keyboard is extremely different between the different
machines.

We could consider the functions of the CLISP lispinit.mem kernel a
black box, but what's about macros?

Was the thread about portability only between UNIX version?

 	Joerg Hoehle.
hoehle@inf-wiss.uni-konstanz.de