[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
portability of .fas files is questionable
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: portability of .fas files is questionable
- From: email@example.com (Joerg-Cyril Hoehle)
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 94 20:25:36 +0100
I agree that having portable .fas files would be a nice thing to have,
but what scheme could be used to avoid problems with machine-specific
macros that get compiled into one's code? As an example,
USER1.LSP:with-keyboard is extremely different between the different
We could consider the functions of the CLISP lispinit.mem kernel a
black box, but what's about macros?
Was the thread about portability only between UNIX version?