[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

suitability of CLOS for large KB

To: commonLoops.PA@Xerox.COM
Subject: suitability of CLOS for large KB
From: <BALL%YALEMED.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 90 19:12 EST
Redistributed: commonLoops.PA

I recently received a reviewer's comments concerning a manuscript
I submitted describing an application of PCL in the domain of
molecular pathology. In these comments was the criticism "CLOS is
NOT well suited to the development of very large knowledge
bases." Does anyone disagree or should I accept this as
constructive criticism?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: suitability of CLOS for large KB
  - From: Gregor J. Kiczales <gregor@parc.xerox.com>
- Re: suitability of CLOS for large KB
  - From: Joseph.Bates@WIZARD.OZ.CS.CMU.EDU
- suitability of CLOS for large KB
  - From: mcbride@eng.sun.com (Philp McBride)
- suitability of CLOS for large KB
  - From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>

Prev by Date: Suitability id CLOS
Next by Date: Re: suitability of CLOS for large KB
Previous by thread: Suitability id CLOS
Next by thread: Re: suitability of CLOS for large KB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread