[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: change in list format
- To: egdorf%zaphod@LANL.GOV (Skip Egdorf)
- Subject: Re: change in list format
- From: ralph@orion.laas.fr
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 1990 02:39:30 PDT
- Cc: kiuchi.pa@arisia.Xerox.COM, CommonLoops.pa@arisia.Xerox.COM
- In-reply-to: <9008301514.AA00733@zaphod.lanl.gov.lanl.gov>
- Reply-to: ralph@orion.laas.fr
- Return-receipt-to: ralph@orion.laas.fr
I disagree that comp.lang.lisp is a good newsgroup for such
discussions. True, there is some discussion there concerning CLOS,
but nowhere near as important as the discussions in the commonloops
mailing list. I would prefer that those discussions go also to a CLOS
only newsgroup. I would support either comp.object.clos or
comp.lang.lisp.clos. There exist already the lisp subgroups
comp.lang.lisp.franz and comp.lang.lisp.x!
Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own.
ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance.
ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph
If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU