[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: standard-type-classes
- To: RPG@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: Re: standard-type-classes
- From: Jim Kempf <kempf%hplabsc@hplabs.HP.COM>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 87 15:25:43 pst
Yes, Gabrial has made a good point. Unless boolean classes
(i.e. classes which are `not' something) are to be admitted,
ATOM is probably a candidate not to have a class for. Most of
the others look like they could have classes though.
Jim Kempf kempf@hplabs.hp.com