[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed syntactic cleanups in defmethod
- To: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Re: proposed syntactic cleanups in defmethod
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 87 21:37 EDT
- Cc: kempf%hplabsz@hplabs.HP.COM, common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <870822-000447-6288@Xerox>
- Line-fold: No
Date: 22 Aug 87 00:04 PDT
From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
To clarify, are you proposing that:
(dolist (x *broken-mail-hosts*)
(defmethod additional-mail-headers
((host (singleton (parse-host x))))
'(:line-fold "No")))
be a reasonable way to assign individual methods to, say, a large number
of individuals?
Yes.
Implementations will have to be careful to allow objects which have
individual methods to be GCd, won't they?
Not my department. Any form of individual methods has this problem.