[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: generic constructor functions
- To: Rick.Busdiecker@h.cs.cmu.edu
- Subject: Re: generic constructor functions
- From: Danny Bobrow <Bobrow.pa@Xerox.COM>
- Date: 29 Jun 87 10:47 PDT
- Cc: CommonLoops.PA@Xerox.COM
- In-reply-to: Rick.Busdiecker@h.cs.cmu.edu's message of 26 Jun 87 22:43 EDT
- Sender: Bobrow.pa@Xerox.COM
Is there any reason not to have class constructor functions be
generic functions?
Constructors can't possibly be generic function since they do not take
the class as an argument. They only take values for the slots.