[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug in lucid-low of 4/29/87 Prime version of PCL
- To: commonloops.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: bug in lucid-low of 4/29/87 Prime version of PCL
- From: Timothy.Freeman@theory.cs.cmu.edu
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 87 00:43:20 EDT
The 4/29/87 version of PCL (which is NOT the most recent one) causes
the Lucid Common Lisp (Sun version 2.0.3) debugger to sometimes try to
print most of memory to the screen. Here's how to recreate the
problem, after you have loaded PCL:
Foo.lisp contains:
(in-package :foo)
(use-package :user)
Foo.lisp has been compiled, and this happens:
> (setq system::*debug-print-level* nil
system::*debug-print-length* nil)
NIL
> (in-package :foo)
#<Package "FOO" 63F133>
> 'hi
HI
> (in-package :user)
#<Package "USER" 43281B>
> (export 'hi)
T
> (load "foo")
>>Error: If the FOO package were to 'use' the USER package,
there would be name conflicts with symbols found in the
following packages ("USER")
The particular symbols involved are:
(USER:HI)
SYSTEM:FASLOAD:
Required arg 0 (FILENAME): #P"/usrea0/tsf/test/foo.2bin"
Keyword arg 1 (VERBOSE): NIL
Keyword arg 2 (PRINT): NIL
Keyword arg 3 (IF-DOES-NOT-EXIST): :ERROR
Keyword arg 4 (DEFAULT-PATHNAME): ".lbin"
Keyword arg 5 (CODE-AREA): #S(LUCID::AREA NIL
"Readonly-Non-Pointer-Area" NIL 0 NIL (#<Unknown-Object C460002> .
#<Unknown-Object 26A4E>) NIL (0 . 0) NIL (328581110 . 0) NIL (328581110
. 0) NIL 0 NIL #S(LUCID::REGION NIL 0 NIL (#<Unknown-Object C460002> .
#<Unknown
The fix I did for this is to go into lucid-low.lisp and comment out
the redefinition of the function lucid::output-structure. Does anyone
out there know why lucid-low.lisp redefines lucid::output-structure?
Is this bug in the most recent version?