[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fixing our problems with setf
- To: "David A. Moon" <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: fixing our problems with setf
- From: kempf%hplabsz@hplabs.HP.COM
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 87 18:15:52 MST
- Cc: common-lisp-object-system@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 28 Sep 87 16:55:00 -0400. <870928165521.9.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
> Add to Common Lisp the same concept of "setf functions" that we are
> already introducing in CLOS. Right now, Common Lisp only has "setf
I endorse this. I don't see any need to change the TRACE proposal,
since (SETF <function name>) was one of the function specifications
included. Do you?
jak