[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 8/2/88 PCL and Allegro 3.0
- To: franz!ucbarpa!Xerox.COM!Gregor.pa@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU
- Subject: Re: 8/2/88 PCL and Allegro 3.0
- From: franz!frisky!jkf@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (John Foderaro)
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 88 11:13:46 PDT
- Cc: franz!ucbarpa!Xerox.COM!CommonLoops.pa@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU, franz!tech@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU
- In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 04 Aug 88 17:21:00 PDT. <19880805002149.9.GREGOR@PORTNOY.parc.xerox.com>
- Redistributed: CommonLoops.pa
>> From: franz!ucbarpa!Xerox.COM!Gregor.pa
>> Yes, this is true. Its kind of unfortunate that this doesn't work in
>> ExCL since having a generic function as the method function of a method
>> is perfectly legal in CLOS. When we get a chance, we should fix this.
I've now fixed this locally and the resulting fin instance variable
accessor code is faster than it was before, so it is a win in more
ways than one. I'll run it through some tests today and then send the
changes to you.
-john foderaro