[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCL/CLOS running on 7.2?
- To: Francois F. Ingrand <Felix@AI.SRI.COM>
- Subject: Re: PCL/CLOS running on 7.2?
- From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: Tue, 31 May 88 14:50 PDT
- Cc: CommonLoops.pa@Xerox.COM
- Fcc: BD:>Gregor>mail>outgoing-mail-2.text.newest
- In-reply-to: <19880531165326.2.FELIX@SENTINEL-ROCK.AI.SRI.COM>, <19880528031851.2.LISP-MACHINE@UNICORN.AI.SRI.COM>, The message of 27 May 88 20:18 PDT from Postmaster@BISHOP.AI.SRI.COM, The message of 27 May 88 20:18 PDT from A Lisp Machine
- Line-fold: no
Date: Tue, 31 May 88 09:53 PDT
From: Francois F. Ingrand <Felix@AI.SRI.COM>
I compile the last version of PCL, using patch rel-7-2-patches.lisp (instead
of rel-7-patches.lisp).
The compilation went fine...
But here is the result of loading test.lisp (on a fresh machine) with only
PCL/CLOS loaded.
Command: Load File SENTINEL-ROCK:>pcl>src>test.lisp
Loading SENTINEL-ROCK:>pcl>src>test.lisp.newest into package PCL
.
.
Testing built-in-class-of...
Trap: The array given to the ZL:AR-1 instruction, #<ART-Q-10.-10. #o44714662>, was 2-dimensional; the function expect
ed a 1-dimensional one.
Trap: The second argument given to the ZL:MEMQ instruction, #<Table 60/120 #o115110016>, was not a cons, or NIL.
Trap: The second argument given to the ZL:MEMQ instruction, #<Table 60/120 #o115110016>, was not a cons, or NIL.
Trap: The second argument given to the ZL:MEMQ instruction, #<Table 60/120 #o115110016>, was not a cons, or NIL.
.
.
Hmm, this doesn't happen for me, and it would seem that other people
aren't having this problem either. Why don't you just ignore this
problem for now. The test.lisp file doesn't really mean that much.
-------