Re: extra tests in built-in-class-of?

[Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM]

    Date: Thu, 18 Aug 88 15:40:03 -0400
    From: kanderso@PEBBLES.BBN.COM

    In 88/8/2 PCL in high.lisp

    Shouldn't built-in-class-of look something like:

Congratulations, you have once again found a source of incredible
bogosity in PCL.  I am working on fixing this right now so that the
change can make it into the next PCL.  It seems something a shame to be
fixing this, since when we do our structure classes we will rewrite it
again, but what the hell.

Thanks for pointing this out.  I can't believe how broken this all was.
-------