[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
issue SYMBOL-MACROLET-SEMANTICS
- To: Sandra J Loosemore <sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu>
- Subject: issue SYMBOL-MACROLET-SEMANTICS
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 89 16:14 EST
- Cc: cl-cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <8902062105.AA00450@defun.utah.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 89 14:05:52 MST
From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
This proposal, which passed at the January meeting, contains the
phrase: "Specify that the expansion of a symbol macro IS subject to
further macro expansion in the same lexical environment as the symbol
macro invocation." Just to clarify this, does this mean that the
second example from p 2-81 of 88-002R is now incorrect?
Yes.