[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

class FUNCTION etc.

Can someone shed some light on why the pre-defined classes listed on
page 1-17 of document 88-002R are not included in Figure 2-1 on page
2-13 of the Feb 21 standard draft from the editorial committee?  In
particular, since proposal FUNCTION-TYPE has already been passed so that
FUNCTION could be a class, how come it isn't one already?