[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: remote environments
- To: David N Gray <Gray@DSG.csc.ti.com>
- Subject: Re: remote environments
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 89 17:36 EST
- Cc: Danny Bobrow <Bobrow.pa@Xerox.COM>, Common-Lisp-Object-System@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <2814562938-4785295@Kelvin>
- Line-fold: No
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 89 17:02:18 CST
From: David N Gray <Gray@DSG.csc.ti.com>
I don't see where DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION has any option for
specifying the class of the method combination; doesn't it always
produce an instance of the pre-defined class METHOD-COMBINATION ?
88-002R p. 1-34 says it can make a subclass of METHOD-COMBINATION.
88-002R doesn't specify the implementation of DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION,
but it might create a new class for each method combination type.