Re: Sun Common Lisp 2.1.3 pcl problem

[Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM]

    Date: Fri, 12 May 89 22:34:52 PDT
    From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>

    Rather than adding many more #+/#- conditionalizations, perhaps the
    best thing would be to resort to using the "lucid::" notation.  This
    is how the files walk.lisp and fin.lisp - and to some degree defs.lisp
    also -- have insulated themselves against the package differences between
    Lucid's version 2 and version 3.  Ordinarily, I would strongly recommend 
    against use of double-colon format in files, but in this particular case, 
    each symbol so qualified is "stable" in it's particular release version.

So what should I used for *redefinition-action*?  system:: or
lucid-common-lisp:: ??
-------