[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: Random metaclasses for CL types
- To: Dick Gabriel <RPG@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, Patrick Dussud <dussud@lucid.com>, Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Subject: re: Random metaclasses for CL types
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 89 13:46 EDT
- Cc: Gray@dsg.csc.ti.com, common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.Stanford.EDU, chapman%aitg.dec@decwrl.dec.com
- In-reply-to: <11c9OI@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, <8905241501.AA02782@challenger>, <8905241503.AA13037@bhopal>, <11cWdx@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
- Reply-to: <Common-Lisp-Object-System-mailer@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
I wish we could bring this conversation back down to earth. All I want
to know is what one-line change to make to the draft ANSI Common Lisp
spec where it says what a conforming program can assume about the
behavior of objects of the built-in types.