[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
call-next-method incoherency
- To: Common-Lisp-Object-System@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: call-next-method incoherency
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 89 10:46 EDT
- In-reply-to: <19890718220816.2.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>, <12uyLq@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, <2825794999-5597375@Kelvin>, <19890719011208.6.GREGOR@SPIFF.parc.xerox.com>, <890718-184159-11318@Xerox>, <8907200126.AA28307@bhopal>, <19890720182310.5.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>, <8907202020.AA11750@challenger>, <19890720213255.6.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>, <8907202329.AA12019@challenger>, <19890721163640.5.GREGOR@SPIFF.parc.xerox.com>
Okay, #3 it is. The next-method-list argument to call-method is
optional.