[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dylan availability
- To: alms@cambridge.apple.com
- Subject: Re: dylan availability
- From: Bob Kerns <rwk@crl.dec.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 15:03:44 -0400
- Cc: kevin@scic.intel.com (Kevin Altis), info-dylan@cambridge.apple.com, dylan-builders@cambridge.apple.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Sep 92 14:57:29 CDT." <9209291844.AA01951@cambridge.apple.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:57:29 -0500
From: alms@cambridge.apple.com
This really depends on what kind of implementation you want. The
Thomas compiler took four people four weeks, I believe (perhaps a bit
less than that). An optimizing native-code compiler with a first-rate
development environment would take many person-years of implementation
effort.
... just like any other such industrial-strength compiler. But this
old compiler writer thinks Dylan would be a bit easier to write compilers
for than a lot of them. Still, most of the work involved in writing
a compiler is scarcely affected by the choice of language.