[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Scott_Fahlman@SEF-PMAX.SLISP.CS.CMU.EDU*Subject*: Re: small integers*From*: cfry@MIT.EDU (Christopher Fry)*Date*: Fri, 09 Oct 92 13:23:50 EST*Cc*: "David A. Moon" <moon@CAMBRIDGE.APPLE.COM>, info-dylan@CAMBRIDGE.APPLE.COM

The Lisp machine approach to fixing the efficiency problems by special architecture failed in the marketplace. But for this integer problem, there are now 64 bit microprocessors. If this represents a real trend, then suppose you just consider that Dylan users that care about speed will have a 64 bit machine and the "small" integers will be a LOT bigger than the 28 bits or so now common. This will alleviate at least some of the need for bignums.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: small integers***From:*Scott_Fahlman@SEF1.SLISP.CS.CMU.EDU

- Prev by Date:
**Re: small integers** - Next by Date:
**Re: small integers** - Previous by thread:
**Re: small integers** - Next by thread:
**Re: small integers** - Index(es):