[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues Involving ThinkC <--> MCL
- To: info-mcl@cambridge.apple.com (Macintosh Common Lisp)
- Subject: Re: Issues Involving ThinkC <--> MCL
- From: cartier@math.uqam.ca (Guillaume Cartier)
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 91 14:19:29 -0500
In a very interresting message, Jonathan Pierce writes the following:
>...
>Calling Think C code resources from MCL is not as useful as it sounds.
>...
Jonathan is indeed right when he says that it would be delicate to use
ThinkC's class library in code resources, but I would suppose that few
people want to use ThinkC with that goal in mind. Why use Think's class
library when whe've got such a wonderfull environment in MCL?
Apart from interfacing with Think's class library, there are few
other limitations to code resources that I see. (but maybe I am wrong?)
Guillaume Cartier
LACIM, Universite du Quebec a Montreal.
Bureau: (514) 987-4290
E-Mail: cartier@math.uqam.ca