[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weirdness in Dylan spec
lieber@MEDIA-LAB.MEDIA.MIT.EDU (Henry Lieberman) writes:
[ stuff about redefining generic functions in Dylan ]
In OO languages such as Smalltalk, Flavors, Actors, etc. the name
of the "message" [= CLOS "generic function"] is merely a
convention between the sender and receiver. That is, different
sender-receiver pairs can use the same name with different
argument lists without conflict.
There will be a conflict if both implementors using the same message
would like to specify default behavior (a method for class object)
for that message.