[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Taboo: MCL 2.0 and PCL (March 92 or newer)
- To: info-mcl
- Subject: Taboo: MCL 2.0 and PCL (March 92 or newer)
- From: omar@kahlua.cc.vanderbilt.edu (Omar Patino-Siliceo)
- Date: 29 Dec 92 16:38:37 GMT
- Followup-to: comp.lang.lisp.mcl
- Keywords: MCL, PCL, MOP
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp.mcl, comp.lang.clos, comp.lang.lisp
- Organization: Vanderbilt University
- Reply-to: omar@kahlua.cc.vanderbilt.edu
- Sender: news@news.vanderbilt.edu
Season's Greetings to all!
I've been using Allegro CL 3.X plus PCL for quite some time. I just bought MCL
2.0 and found out that it does not [yet] fully implement the meta object
protocol (neither does PCL but I can live with what PCL currently offers).
My application requires the use of the class option :metaclass in the macro
defclass, and the dynamic change of class definitions.
Has anybody built (ported) PCL to MCL 2.0? I'm spoiled using UNIX systems. All
I had to do (under that kind of environment) in order to compile PCL was to
modify a few lines (subdirectory paths and such) and run a make command. I have
no idea how to do it in MCL. Any help that you can provide will be greatly
appreciated.
--
__ _ _
/ \ | | Omar Patino-Siliceo * Computer Ctr. Vanderbilt Univ. * Box 1375,
| | |- Sta. B. Nashville, TN 37235. *** ``Research is what I am doing
_\ /_ | \ when I don't know what I'm doing'' --- Wernner von Braun