[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Dylan implemented on Common Lisp
In article <email@example.com>
firstname.lastname@example.org "Rob Browning" writes:
> In article <D584q4.2E8@cee.hw.ac.uk>, email@example.com (Andrew Dinn) wrote:
> > If you add on top of this the overheads for CLOS (which is also not
> > layered and hence made Common Lisp an even bigger ball of mud) then
> > you can change thet 12 Mb to 20 Mb.
> I don't know what system you're talking about, but MCL only takes up about
> 2-3 MB even with CLOS, an entire optimizing *compiler*, and all the
> Macintosh interface glue.
Whereas to develop with Visual C++ 2.0 under NT 3.5 you _really_ need 24Mb.
I have 20Mb and it shows. Would take Common Lisp anyday, given the choice.
Mondas IT Ltd