[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid

To: edsel!jonl@labrea.stanford.edu
Subject: Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid
From: jpff%maths.bath.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 88 10:58:58 BST
Cc: boyer%rascal.ics.utexas.edu@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK, kcl@cli.com
In-reply-to: Jon L White's message of Thu, 2 Jun 88 12:52:35 PDT <8806021952.AA27030@bhopal.lucid.com>
Sender: jpff%maths.bath.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK

We have programs where KCL is faster than Lucid on a SUN.  These were
not specially wtitten to exploit any one system.
  We just write Common LISP (when we have to!), and do not spend hours
tuning.  Incidently we also include Poplog/Common LISP in our
comparisons.
==John

References:
- Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid
  - From: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid
Next by Date: Call for publishable code!
Previous by thread: Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid
Next by thread: Further speed comparisons of AKCL and Lucid
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread