[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: RMS at MIT-MC
- From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- Date: Sun ,1 Feb 81 01:09:00 EDT
- Cc: LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC
Why don't we introduce LETF which is a LET with the semantics you have
suggested. The parallel between SET/LET and SETF/LETF would be quite pleasant.