[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: BUG-LISP at MIT-MC
- From: George J. Carrette <GJC at MIT-MC>
- Date: Tue ,14 Oct 80 18:20:00 EDT
- Cc: LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC
(setq Y '(1 2 3))
(setf (setq x (CAR y)) 100)
; Obscure format - SETF
I don't want to give anyone the idea that I sit
around thinking up these wierd things, this
was created by a macro.
(setf (progn (hprint "Howdy hacker") x) 99)
seems to work. So I would think the same
value-propagation code should work for SETQ. (****)
What do people think about SETF through COND, DO, etc.
Obviously these have to be dealt with if an RMS-style
destructuring binder is going to be all it could be.