[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EQ(UAL) in SUBST
- To: Guy.Steele at CMU-10A
- Subject: Re: EQ(UAL) in SUBST
- From: Daniel L. Weinreb <dlw at MIT-AI>
- Date: Thu ,11 Dec 80 03:23:00 EDT
- Cc: Scott.Fahlman at CMU-10A, lisp-forum at MIT-MC
- Sender: dlw at CADR7 at MIT-AI
I agree, we should have such a function. I would prefer the name EQP;
after all, it is a predicate, and since the name has already been used
for this by Interlisp, calling it EQL would be gratuitously
incompabible.