Re: EQP/EQL

[Robert W. Kerns <RWK at MIT-MC>]

Better definition:

(DEFUN EQL (X Y)
  (OR (EQ X Y)
      (AND (NUMBERP X)
	   (EQUAL X Y))))

Remember, in our dialect, at least, EQUAL doesn't consider 2.0 and 2 to
be equal.  Does INTERLISP?  If not, then their EQP isn't even a 'Smart EQ'
directly between EQ and EQUAL on the spectrum.