[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal
- To: dlw at MIT-AI, Guy Steele at CMU-10A
- Subject: LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal
- From: Earl A. Killian <EAK at MIT-MC>
- Date: Thu ,1 Oct 81 01:25:00 EDT
- Cc: LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC
I also think the GLS suggestion is a loser. By being concise, it
eliminates the possibility of growth. I'd want it to at least
support some sort of type information for those places where that
is appropriate (which is admittedly nowhwere on the the LISPM).